Distribution monthly scorecard
π Scorecard contents
The monthly scorecard reports these measures, one page per channel plus a consolidated view. Definitions, formulas and data sources live in the KPIs and Performance Measures space β the scorecard states values and trends only.
π Monthly reporting lifecycle
Data extraction completed from policy admin, CRM, and actuarial systems
Finance reconciliation and tolerance checks performed
RAG thresholds automatically applied and validated
Business owners submit commentary for all consecutive amber/red indicators
Distribution leadership reviews consolidated scorecard
Approved scorecard published and archived in the reporting library
πΊοΈ Reporting process overview
flowchart LR
A[Source Systems] --> B[Data Extracts]
B --> C[Scorecard Workbook]
C --> D[Reconciliation Checks]
D --> E[RAG Classification]
E --> F[Leadership Review]
F --> G[Publication & Archive]
D -->|Exception| H[Finance Operations Escalation]π‘οΈ Operational governance
Role | Responsibility | Escalation Trigger |
|---|---|---|
Distribution Operations | Produce and validate the monthly scorecard | Data not delivered by working day 6 |
Finance Operations | Own financial reconciliation and tolerance disputes | GWP variance exceeds 0.5% |
Channel Heads | Provide commentary and remediation actions | Amber/red KPI without owner action |
COO Office | Review persistent operational risk themes | Any KPI red for 3 consecutive months |
π Live scorecard workbook
The live scorecard workbook (sample data):
Measure | Target | Tolerance |
|---|---|---|
Gross written premium vs plan | 100% | 95% amber, 90% red |
New business policy count | Plan | 10% |
Quote-to-bind conversion | 32% | 28% amber |
π¦ RAG rules
βΉοΈ Commentary requirements
Red or amber for two consecutive months requires a commentary block: cause, action, owner, date. Green measures carry no commentary β the scorecard is for exceptions, not narration.
β οΈ Escalation threshold
Any KPI remaining red for three consecutive reporting periods must trigger a remediation plan review with the Distribution COO and Finance Operations. Owners must provide recovery milestones and revised target dates before the next ops review.
π§© Data quality and control principles
- Source data must remain system-derived with no manual adjustment inside the reporting workbook.
- Reconciliation differences greater than 0.5% must be investigated before publication.
- Missing values are recorded explicitly as "no data" rather than left blank.
- Historical KPI thresholds may only be changed through the KPI governance approval process.
πΌ Executive review expectations
During monthly operational reviews, leadership focus is expected on:
- Persistent amber/red trends
- Material deviations from production plan
- Deterioration in customer or intermediary quality metrics
- Operational control themes and remediation progress
- Emerging distribution capacity constraints